RAS PresidiumVoprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9606
  • ISSN (Online)2713-041X

J. Arnason’s Civilizational and Relational Analysis and Global Dimension of Soviet Modernity

PII
S013216250016501-4-
DOI
10.31857/S013216250016501-4
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 9
Pages
151-156
Abstract

The volume «Civilizational patterns and historical processes» includes J. Arnason’s works on the theory and methodology of civilizational analysis as a paradigm of historical sociology related to the «cultural turn». It distinguishes some varieties of modern civilizational analysis and explains their differences from the traditional one. The second part of the review considers J. Arnason’s contribution into investigations of soviet modernity in the terms of alternative globalization project as well as the communism entangled with the Chinese one.

Keywords
Johan Arnason, civilizational analysis, historical sociology, modernity, Sovietology
Date of publication
27.09.2021
Number of purchasers
6
Views
168

References

  1. 1. Arnason J. (2021) Civilizational Patterns and Historical Processes. Moscow: NLO. (In Russ.)
  2. 2. Braslavskiy R.G. (2020) Sociological Models of Contemporary Civilizational Analysis. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology. Vol. 23. No. 5: 7–40. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.31119/jssa.2020.23.5.1
  3. 3. David-Fox M. (2016) Russian/Soviet Modernity: Absent, Common, Alternative or Entangled? Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Observer]. No. 4: 19–44. (In Russ.)
  4. 4. Knöbl W. (2010) Path Dependency and Civilizational Analysis: Methodological Challenges and Theoretical Tasks. European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 13. No. 1: 83–97. DOI: 10.1177/1368431009355862
  5. 5. Maslovskiy M. (2019) Russia against Europe: A Clash of Interpretations of Modernity? European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 22. No. 4: 533–547. DOI: 10.1177/1368431018768623
  6. 6. Smith J. (2017) Debating Civilisations: Interrogating Civilisational Analysis in a Global Age. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  7. 7. Spohn W. (2001) Eisenstadt on Civilizations and Multiple Modernity: Review Essay. European Journal of Social Theory. Vol. 4. No. 4: 499–508. DOI: 10.1177/13684310122225280
  8. 8. Wagner P. (2010) Multiple Trajectories of Modernity: Why Social Theory Needs Historical Sociology. Thesis Eleven. No. 100: 53–60. DOI: 10.1177/0725513609353705
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library