- PII
- S013216250016833-9-
- DOI
- 10.31857/S013216250016833-9
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue 3
- Pages
- 135-146
- Abstract
The article supports the hypothesis that the COVID-19 pandemic accelerated and legitimized societal change associated with the decline of representative democracy, mass employment and economic growth. The ideological coordinates of the society of mass labor are becoming obsolete as a relevant model of description. As a result, a decrease in the military, economic and civil-political significance of the majority is observed. The request of precariat groups to restore their usefulness in alternative criteria is expanding, which will eventually bring about a new political and economic normality. Civil protest intensified by the pandemic and the radical practices of minorities are part of the process of a critical revision of the consolidating values in the labor society and transition to a new normality. The conclusion is argued that the growth of "unnecessary people" actualizes demand for non-economic communitarian values and resources provided mainly by the state. The revision of the usual market and labor hierarchies of society is empirically confirmed by the value gap between generations. First, the pessimism in rising generation regarding the prospects of improving standard of living compared to previous generations. Second, the life strategies of generation Z prefer adaptive practices associated with rent-oriented behavior and loyalty to the generation of parents. Third, late modern society is characterized by a decline of political subjectivity. All this limits potential scope of future transformations, mainly related to basic unconditional income and selective expansion of rental access.
- Keywords
- COVID-19, coronavirus, labor society, heterarchy, precariat, stratification, new normality, rent-seeking behavior, youth
- Date of publication
- 28.03.2022
- Year of publication
- 2022
- Number of purchasers
- 11
- Views
- 171
References
- 1. Vajs Kh. My nikogda ne byli srednim klassom. Kak sotsial'naya mobil'nost' vvodit nas v zabluzhdenie M.: Izd. dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-2534-0
- 2. Kravchenko S.A. Metamorfozy: suschnost', uslozhnyayuschiesya tipy, mesto v sotsiologicheskom znanii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2017. № 10. S. 3–14.
- 3. Lapina N.Yu. Ne ochen' schastlivaya globalizatsiya: frantsuzskij opyt // Rossiya i sovremennyj mir. 2020. № 2 (107). S. 190–209.
- 4. Lobovikov V.O. Kriminologiya, istoriya filosofii i diskretnaya matematicheskaya model' formal'noj aksiologii prestupnoj deyatel'nosti («Po ponyatiyam» li myslili i zhili vydayuschiesya filosofy?) // Nauchnyj ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava UrO RAN. 2015. T. 15. Vyp. 4. S. 5–24.
- 5. Mart'yanov V.S. Politicheskie sub'ekty pozdnego kapitalizma: ot ehkonomicheskikh klassov k rentoorientirovannym men'shinstvam // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya. 2018. № 3(43). S. 181–190.
- 6. Milanovich B. Global'noe neravenstvo. Novyj podkhod dlya ehpokhi globalizatsii. M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara, 2017.
- 7. Prekariat: stanovlenie novogo klassa / Pod red. Zh.T. Toschenko. M.: Tsentr sotsial'nogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga, 2020.
- 8. Radaev V.V. Raskol pokoleniya millenialov: istoricheskoe i ehmpiricheskoe obosnovanie. (Okonchanie) // Sotsiologicheskij zhurnal. 2020. T. 26. № 4. S. 31–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2020.26.4.764
- 9. Rudenko V.N. Populistskij kontsept zaschity prav cheloveka v usloviyakh krizisa soglasitel'nykh politicheskikh sistem // Antinomii. 2019. T. 19. № 4. S. 138–155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24411/2686-7206-2019-00012
- 10. Sedova N. N. Zhiznennyj uspekh molodezhi – ot Moskvy do samykh do okrain // Monitoring obschestvennogo mneniya: Ehkonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny. 2019. № 6. S. 505–529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2019.6.26
- 11. Srnichek N., Uil'yams A. Izobretaya buduschee: postkapitalizm i mir bez truda. M.: Strelka Press, 2019.
- 12. Stiglits Dzh. Velikoe razdelenie. Neravenstvo v obschestve, ili chto delat' ostavshimsya 99% naseleniya? M.: Ehksmo, 2016
- 13. Tvenge Dzh. Pokolenie I. Pochemu pokolenie Interneta utratilo buntarskij dukh, stalo bolee tolerantnym, menee schastlivym – i absolyutno ne gotovym ko vzrosloj zhizni. M.: Ripol-Klassik, 2019.
- 14. Fishman L.G. Liberal'nyj konsensus: drejf ot neoliberalizma k kommunitarizmu // POLIS. Politicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. №4. S. 152-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.04.10
- 15. Fishman L.G., Mart'yanov V.S., Davydov D.A. Rentnoe obschestvo: v teni truda, kapitala i demokratii. M.: Izd. dom VShEh, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/978-5-7598-1913-4
- 16. Granovetter M. 2005. The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 19. No. 1. pp. 33–50.
- 17. Inglehart R. 2018. Cultural Evolution. People’s Motivations Are Changing, and Reshaping the . Cambridge University Press.
- 18. Jameson F. Valences of the Dialectic. UK: Verso, 2009.
- 19. Karaganov S.A. 2019. A Predictable Future? // Russia in global affairs. V.17. No 2. P. 60-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2019-17-2-60-74.
