RAS PresidiumVoprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9606
  • ISSN (Online)2713-041X

Digital culture vs cultural originality? (from the experience of preserving Chinese cultural identity)

PII
S013216250016859-7-
DOI
10.31857/S013216250016858-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 3
Pages
90-97
Abstract

This paper examines the problem of the own cultural identity maintenance in the context of modern processes of globalization, informatization and digitalization, so as the development of digital modernity in China. The article emphasizes such a feature in the process of formation of digital modernity in Chinese society as the actualization of tradition in modern digital culture. This feature manifests not as the archaization of culture and restoration of the past but as a harmonious interweaving of the modern with the traditional, the Western with the Chinese. The paper suggests that the possibilities for the synthesis of tradition and innovation are inherent in the very origins of Chinese civilization. The holistic worldview that has been repeatedly considered by the researchers of Chinese culture and philosophy is also of great importance. The authors considered it necessary to reflect the ideology of holism in the form that means ‘to be in agreement, having different views’, ‘striving for harmony while maintaining differences’.

Keywords
Chinese society, tradition, modernity, digitization, digimodernism
Date of publication
28.03.2022
Number of purchasers
11
Views
175

References

  1. 1. Abramov V.A., Abramova N.A. Tsennostnyj potentsial kitajskogo «moguschestvennogo kul'turnogo gosudarstva» v proektsiyakh global'nogo razvitiya. M.: Vostochnaya kniga , 2014.
  2. 2. Van Tsyan'. Moda na vse kitajskoe // Kitaj. 2020. № 5. S. 64-65.
  3. 3. Gao Mo. Onlajn-obrazovanie // Kitaj. 2020. № 4.S. 58–59.
  4. 4. Kataeva O.V. Tsifrovizatsiya i virtualizatsiya zhiznennogo mira: otsenki i pozitsii // Intellekt. Innovatsii. Investitsii. 2020. №6. S. 129–136.
  5. 5. Kirbi A. Smert' postmodernizma i to, chto posle // Metamodern. Zhurnal o metamodernizme; per. s angl. S. Onasenko. URL: http://metamodernizm.ru/the-death-of-postmodernism (data obrascheniya: 15.03.2020).
  6. 6. Li Van'li. Vliyanie drevnekitajskoj filosofskoj mysli na sovremennuyu zhizn' v Kitae: sotsial'no-filosofskij diskurs. Diss. … k. filos. n. Chita, 2020.
  7. 7. Mironov V.V. Platon i sovremennaya peschera big-data // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Filosofiya i konfliktologiya. 2019. T. 35. Vyp. 1. S. 4–24.
  8. 8. Ni Tszyaotszyao. Fenomen kul'turnogo brenda v sovremennoj kitajskoj kul'ture. Diss. … k. filos. n. Chita, 2019.
  9. 9. Noskova V.B. Filosofiya chajnoj tseremonii // Diskurs Pi. № 1–2. 2010. S. 68–72.
  10. 10. Pavlov A.V. Obrazy sovremennosti v XXI veke: didzhimodernizm: retsenziya na knigu Alana Kirbi // Filosofiya. Zhurnal Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki. 2018. T. II. № 2. S. 197–212.
  11. 11. Speshnev N.A. Kitajtsy: osobennosti natsional'noj psikhologii. SPb.: Karo, 2017.
  12. 12. Syuj Khunbo. Osobennosti kitajskogo natsional'nogo kharaktera (chast' 2) // Molodoj uchenyj. 2011. № 3 (26). T. 2. S. 190–191.
  13. 13. Khu Yanli. Spetsifika globalizatsionnykh protsessov v kul'ture Kitaya Diss. … k. kul'tur. Vladivostok, 2016.
  14. 14. Tsuj Dinin', Yan Syueh, Gu Yan'vehn'. Spetsifika i tsennosti brendov kul'turnoj industrii // Kehtszi tszinzi shichan'. 2016. № 7. S. 81–85. (na kit.yaz.)
  15. 15. Bauer W. The China and the Hoping for Happiness. The Paradise. The Utopian. The Ideals. N.Y.: Izd-vo, 1973.
  16. 16. McDermott J. Those people we tried to cancel? They All Hang Out Together // NYTIMES. 2019. November. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/02/style/what-is-cancel-culture.html (data obrascheniya:13.09. 2021).
  17. 17. Wang Yilei, Feng Dezheng. History, modernity, and city branding in China: a multimodal critical discourse analysis of Xi’an’s promotional videos on social media// Social Semiotics. 2021. Vol. 1. URL: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10350330.2020.1870405 (accessed 17.03.2020).
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library