RAS PresidiumВопросы истории естествознания и техники Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9606
  • ISSN (Online) 2713-041X

Grumbling ‘Oldies’, Whining ‘Youngsters’, and Progress of Sociology

PII
S013216250018033-9-
DOI
10.31857/S013216250018033-9
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 2
Pages
3-11
Abstract

The article is presenting the author's approach to the problem of progress in contemporary sociology. Two kinds of the crisis discourse questioning the sociology’s progress are analyzed. Such discourses are associated with the different generations of sociologists who consider in different ways conceptual, institutional, and instrumental changes in the scientific discipline. The progress in the recent history of sociology is traced in the form of tendencies towards more complex and coherent representations of social order / structures, social action / agency, and social change / development. The progress in sociological theory and methodology is approved. The article argues the special role of post-virtualization processes and digitalization routine in formation of the structures, agency patterns, and social development models which define actual agenda in studies of sociology’s fundamental subjects: social order, social action, and social change. 

Keywords
sociology, scientific progress, structure, agency, social development, digitalization routine
Date of publication
18.03.2022
Year of publication
2022
Number of purchasers
11
Views
226

References

  1. 1. Baehr W. P. (2020) The Arrest of Sociology. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 9: 3–15. (In Russ.)
  2. 2. Weber M. (1990) Selected Works. Moscow: Progress. (In Russ.)
  3. 3. Šubrt J. (2021) Reflections on Modern Russian Sociology and its Prospects. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya [Sociological Studies]. No. 1: 5–15. (In Russ.)
  4. 4. Campbell C. (2019) Has Sociology Progressed? Reflections of an Accidental Academic. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. 5. Castells M. (2000) The Rise of the Network Society. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  6. 6. Go J. (2020) Race, Empire, and Epistemic Exclusion: Or the Structures of Sociological Thought. Sociological Theory. Vol. 38. Iss. 2, June: 79–100.
  7. 7. Go J., Lawson G. (2017) Global Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. 8. House J.S. (2019) Culminating Crisis in American Sociology and its Role in Social Sciences and Public Policy: An Autobiographical, Mulitmethod, Reflexive Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology. Vol 45. No.1: 1–19.
  9. 9. Knorr Cetina K. (2009) The Synthetic Situation: Interactionism for a Global World. Symbolic Interaction. Vol. 32. Issue 1: 61–87.
  10. 10. Kuhn T. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  11. 11. Latour B. (2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: University Press.
  12. 12. Patil V. (2018) The Heterosexual Matrix as Imperial Effect. Sociological Theory. No. 36 (1): 1–26.
  13. 13. Urry J. (2000) Sociology beyond Societies. Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library