“Transitional Generation”: Understanding of the Own Generation by Russian Millennials
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
“Transitional Generation”: Understanding of the Own Generation by Russian Millennials
Annotation
PII
S013216250018036-2-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Daria S. Petrunina 
Occupation: Research Assistant at the Center for Youth Studies
Affiliation: National Research University “Higher School of Economics” in St. Petersburg
Address: Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
Edition
Pages
57-64
Abstract

The article analyzes Russian millennials' perceptions of their generation. Despite the correspondence of Russian millennials to the general characteristics described in the foreign academic discussion, the article notes that the experience of the Russian millennial generation differs from the global one, as for the most part it includes the national historical and cultural context. The theoretical aspects of the article are based both on classical approaches to generational studies and on contemporary debates about how individuals inhabit global and national experiences during their formative years. Based on Korsten's discursive approach, the paper examines the narratives of three age cohorts of St. Petersburg residents. The analysis of the empirical material revealed a discourse on the transitional nature of the generation, conceptualized by informants within the technology, political structure, and socio-economic well-being of Russia during their formative years.

Keywords
generations, generational identity, millennials, qualitative methodology, youth, Russia
Received
16.02.2022
Date of publication
18.03.2022
Number of purchasers
11
Views
61
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013216250018036-2-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 16.02.2022
Cite Download pdf

References

1. Radayev V.V. (2019) Millennials: How Russian Society is Changing. Moscow: VSHE. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/978-5-7598-1985-1

2. Semenova V.V. (2009) Social dynamics of generations: problem and reality. Moscow: ROSSPEN. (In Russ.)

3. Berger A.A. (2017) Cultural perspectives on millennials. London: Springer.

4. Howe N., Strauss W. (2000) Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books.

5. Aroldi P., Fortunati L., Gebhardt J., Vincent J. (2011) Generational belonging between media audiences and ICT users. In: Broadband society and generational changes. Vol. 5.

6. Beck U., Beck-Gernsheim E. (2009) Global generations and the trap of methodological nationalism for a cosmopolitan turn in the sociology of youth and generation. European sociological review. Vol. 25. No. 1: 25–36.

7. Bialik K., Fry R. (2019). Millennial life: How young adulthood today compares with prior generations. Pew Research Center. No. 14: 1–11.

8. Corsten M. (1999). The time of generations. Time & Society. Vol. 8. No. 2-3: 249–272.

9. Edmunds, J., & Turner, B. S. (2005). Global generations: social change in the twentieth century. The British journal of sociology. Vol. 56. No. 4: 559–577.

10. Holmes A., Conway M. A. (1999). Generation identity and the reminiscence bump: Memory for public and private events. Journal of adult development. Vol. 6. No. 1: 21–34.

11. Mannheim K. (1970). The problem of generations. Psychoanalytic review. Vol. 57. No. 3: 378–404.

12. Philipps J. (2018) A global generation? Youth studies in a postcolonial world. Societies. Vol. 8. No. 1: 14. DOI:10.3390/soc8010014

13. Thomson A. (2016) Australian generations? Memory, oral history and generational identity in postwar Australia. Australian Historical Studies. Vol. 47. No. 1: 41–57.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate