Везде

RAS PresidiumVoprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9606
  • ISSN (Online)2713-041X

DIFFERENTIATION AND ORGANIZATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL STRUCTURES IN SUBJECT’S ACQUIRING OF COMPETENCE IN NEW SUBJECT FIELDS. PART II. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES OF EXISTENCE OF SELF-REPLICATING STRUCTURES

You can
PII
S020595920004055-6-
DOI
10.31857/S020595920004055-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
N. Maksimova
Igor Aleksandrov
  • Occupation: leading research scientist, Laboratory of Psychophysiology named after V. B. Shvyrkov
  • Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Address: Russian Federation
Yu. Zavarnova
  • Occupation: post-graduate student
  • Affiliation: State Academic University of Humanities
  • Address: Russian Federation
V. S.
  • Occupation: Clinical psychologist, Department of Outpatient Psychiatry and Organization of Psychiatric Care
  • Affiliation: Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry
  • Address: Russian Federation
D. Turubar
  • Occupation: Leading specialist of information and analytical Department
  • Affiliation: Dmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology
  • Address: Russian Federation
Volume/ Edition
Volume 40 / Issue 2
Pages
47-65
Abstract

The study is focused on the problem of existence of prototype form (replicator) for development of new psychological structures relevant to subject fields newly acquiring by individual. Participants of the study were 158 Ss: 118 – from population sample, 40 Ss were outpatients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Ss acquired competence in two subject fields: “Chess Knight Move” (problem solving of 48 tasks) and strategic game of two partners «Tic-Tac-Toe on the board of 15×15». Ss fulfilled “Spatial Orientation Test” and of “Mental Rotation Test”, and they also were asked to fill questionnaires “Motivational Structure of Personality” and “Self-Regulation Style”. Affinity of organization of psychological structures related to different subject fields were found; evolutionary trajectories of psychological structures are mutually homeomorphic because they are originated initially by replication of common self-similar and fractal structure-ancestor developed previously, and then – as a product of their self-replication. The characteristics of heterogeneous semantic network specific for patients were revealed. Main properties of non-planar constituents of the heterogeneous semantic networks describing psychological structures were found as well as a role of homeomorphism between non-planar constituents of psychological structures and organization of tests’ tasks in course of search of correct decisions. It was substantiated the hypothesis that stability and commonalities of different individual-psychological properties result from genetical affinity of psychological structures relevant to various subject fields.

Keywords
psychological structure, subject field, population sample, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, individual-psychological properties, heterogeneous semantic network, self-similarity, non-planar graphs, auto-replication, differentiation.
Date of publication
25.03.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
931

References

  1. 1.  Aleksandrov I.O. Formirovanie struktury individual'nogo znaniya. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2006. (In Russian)
  2. 2. Aleksandrov I.O., Maksimova N.E. Protsess differentsiatsii: soderzhanie kontsepta i vozmozhnosti operatsionalizatsii v psihologicheskih issledovaniyah / Differentsionno-integratsionnaya teoriya razvitiya. Kn. 2. Moscow: YAzyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2014. P. 87–138. (In Russian)
  3. 3. Aleksandrov I.O., Maksimova N.E. Znachenie printsipa vzaimodejstviya/razvitiya dlya issledovaniya kommunikatsii // Obrazovanie i razvitie lichnosti v sovremennom kommunikativnom prostranstve: Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem / Ed. I.M. Kyshtymova. Irkutsk: Asprint, 2016. P. 8–16. (In Russian)
  4. 4. Aleksandrov YU.I. Psihofiziologicheskoe znachenie aktivnosti tsentral'nyh i perifericheskih nejronov v povedenii. Moscow: Nauka, 1989. (In Russian)
  5. 5. Anohin P.K. Printsipial'nye voprosy obshchej teorii funktsional'nyh sistem // Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional'nyh sistem. Moscow: Meditsina, 1975. P. 17–62. (In Russian)
  6. 6. Galkina T.V. Samootsenka kak protsess resheniya zadach: sistemnyj podhod. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2011. (In Russian)
  7. 7. Gorkin A.G., Kuzina E.A., Ivlieva N.P., Solov'eva O.A., Aleksandrov YU.I. Patterny aktivnosti nejronov retrosplenial'noj kory v instrumental'nom pishchedobyvatel'nom povedenii u krys raznogo vozrasta // ZHurn. VND, 2017. V. 67. № 3. P. 334–340. (In Russian)
  8. 8. Kol'tsov N.K. Fiziko-himicheskie osnovy morfologii. Rech' na pervom torzhestvennom sobranii III Vsesoyuznogo s"ezda zoologov, anatomov, gistologov v Leningrade 12 dekabrya 1927 goda // Organizatsiya kletki. Sbornik ehksperimental'nyh issledovanij, statej i rechej 1903–1935 gg. Moscow-Leningrad: Biomedgiz, 1936. P. 461–490. (In Russian)
  9. 9. Kritskaya V.P., Meleshko T.K. Patopsihologiya shizofrenii. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2015. (In Russian)
  10. 10. Krylov A.K. Fraktal'nyj analiz aktivnosti nejronov i povedeniya modeli // Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Prikladnaya nelinejnaya dinamika. 2011. V. 19. № 6. P. 109–116. (In Russian)
  11. 11. Kuznetsov S.P. Giperbolicheskie strannye attraktory sistem, dopuskayushchie fizicheskuyu realizatsiyu // Izv. vuzov “Problemy nelinejnoj dinamiki”. V. 17. № 4. 2009. P. 5–34. (In Russian)
  12. 12. Leont'ev A.N. Problemy razvitiya psihiki. Moscow: Izd-vo APN RSFSR, 1959. (In Russian)
  13. 13. Loskutov A.YU. Ocharovanie haosa // Uspekhi fizicheskih nauk. 2010. V. 180. № 12. P. 1305–1329. (In Russian)
  14. 14. Maksimova N.E., Aleksandrov I.O. Vozmozhnaya traektoriya ehvolyutsionnogo razvitiya psihologii. CH. II: Organizatsiya predmetnoj oblasti psihologii // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2016. V. 37. № 2. P. 5–18. (In Russian)
  15. 15. Maksimova N.E., Aleksandrov I.O., Zavarnova YU.A. K obosnovaniyu konstrukta “operirovanie abstraktsiyami” // SHestaya Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po kognitivnoj nauke, Kaliningrad, 23–27 iyunya 2014 g. Kaliningrad, 2014. P. 115–117. (In Russian)
  16. 16. Maksimova N.E., Aleksandrov I.O., Zavarnova YU.A., Sviridov V.S., Turubar D.S. Differentsiatsiya i organizatsiya psihologicheskih struktur pri vzaimodejstvii individa s novymi predmetnymi oblastjami. CH. I. Svojstva autoreplitsiruiushchejsia structur i ih operatsionalizatsija // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 2019. V. 40. № 1. P. 5–18. (In Russian)
  17. 17. Maksimova N.E., Aleksandrov I.O., Sviridov V.S., Zavarnova YU.A. Osobennosti organizatsii psihologicheskih struktur pri dejstvii nejroleptikov // Vos'maya Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya po kognitivnoj nauke, Svetlogorsk, 18–21 oktyabrya 2018 g. Svetlogorsk, 2018. P. 671–673. (In Russian)
  18. 18. Ponomarev YA.A. Znaniya, myshlenie i umstvennoe razvitie. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 1967. (In Russian)
  19. 19. Ponomarev YA.A. Psihologiya tvorchestva. Moscow: Nauka, 1976. (In Russian)
  20. 20. Ponomarev YA.A. Perspektivy psihologii tvorchestva // Psihologiya tvorchestva: shkola YA.A. Ponomareva / Ed. D.V. Ushakov. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2006. S. 145–276. (In Russian)
  21. 21. Svarnik O.E. Aktivnost' mozga: Spetsializatsiya nejrona i differentsiatsiya opyta. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016. (In Russian)
  22. 22. Holodnaya M.A. EHffekty differentsiatsii i integratsii kontseptual'nyh struktur v svyazi s proyavleniyami psihometricheskoj kreativnosti // Differentsionno-integratsionnaya teoriya razvitiya. Kn. 2. Moscow: YAzyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2014. P. 383–399. (In Russian)
  23. 23. SHvyrkov V.B. Sistemno-ehvolyutsionnyj podhod k izucheniyu mozga, psihiki, soznaniya // Psihologicheskij zhurnal. 1988. V. 9. № 1. P. 132–148. (In Russian)
  24. 24. Alexandrov Yu.I., Grechenko T.N., Gavrilov V.V., Gorkin A.G., Shevchenko D.G., Grinchenko Yu.V., Aleksandrov I.O., Maksimova N.E., Bezdenezhnykh B.N., Bodunov M.V. Formation and realization of individual experience // Neurosci. and Behav. Physiol. 1997. V. 27. № 4. P. 441–454.
  25. 25. Balu D.T., Lucki I. Adult hippocampal neurogenesis: regulation, functional implications, and contribution to disease pathology // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2009. V. 33(3). P. 232–252.
  26. 26. Bartlett F.C. Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1932.
  27. 27. Brewer W.F. Bartlett's concept of the schema and its impact on theories of knowledge representation in contemporary cognitive psychology / A Saito (Ed.). Bartlett, culture and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Psychology Press. 2000. P. 69–89.
  28. 28. Godfrey-Smith P. The replicator in retrospect // Biology and Philosophy. 2000. V. 15. P. 403–423.
  29. 29. Grebogi C., Ott E., Yorke J.A. Chaos, Strange Attractors, and Fractal Basin Boundaries in Nonlinear Dynamics // Science. New Series. 1987. Vol. 238. No. 4827. P. 632–638.
  30. 30. Hill S.K., Harris M.S., Herbener E.S., Pavuluri M., Sweeney J.A. Neurocognitive allied phenotypes for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder // Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2008. V. 34. № 4. P. 743–759.
  31. 31. Luce R.D. Response times: their role in inferring elementary mental organization (Oxford psychology series; № 8). N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  32. 32. Maturana U. Varela F. Autopoiesis and cognition // Boston studies in the philosophy of science. V. 42. Dordrecht, Boston: Reidel Publishing Company. 1980.
  33. 33. Schoenfeld T.J. Cameron H.A. Adult neurogenesis and mental illness // Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015. V. 40(1). P. 113–128.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library