Везде
Peculiarities of speech-thinking activity in children with monolingualism and natural bilingualism
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Peculiarities of speech-thinking activity in children with monolingualism and natural bilingualism
Annotation
PII
S020595920014236-5-
DOI
10.31857/S020595920014236-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
V. Khotinets 
Occupation: head of general psychology chair
Affiliation: Institute of Pedagogy, Psychology and Social technologies
Address: Izhevsk, 426034, Universitetskaya str., 1
D. Medvedeva
Affiliation: Udmurt State University
Address: Universitetskaya str., 1
Edition
Volume 42 issue 2
Pages
25-35
Abstract

Theoretical procedural model of speech-thinking activity development in primary school children with natural bilingualism under educational situation that meets modern requirements for self-organization models is constructed. The study involved 152 children, senior preschoolers and junior schoolchildren, bilinguals and monolinguals. The results of formative experiment confirmed the establishment of intra-system relations (relationships between the components of the system) in transition from one cycle to another in development of speech-thinking activity as an integral system with variable relations with cultural and educational environment. It is shown that in situation where cultural discourse in the native language is a psychological and pedagogical tool in educational environment, the integration of the system increases and new connections between its components (the structure of the system changes) appears, the proportions of dependent variables’ (conceptual speech and conceptual intuitive thinking) variance that can be explained by the variance of independent variable (speech development) are established. When cultural discourse in Russian becomes an organizational form for learning-creative independent activity the differentiation of speech processes and functions becomes apparent, written speech appears and contribution of conceptual speech thinking to the variance of speech development is established.

Keywords
self-organization model, integral system, intra-system connections, cultural and educational environment, educational situation, cultural discourse, speech-thinking activity, bilinguals, primary school age
Received
20.03.2021
Date of publication
04.04.2021
Number of purchasers
6
Views
272
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S020595920014236-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 15.03.2021
Cite Download pdf

References

1. Volkova E.V. Edinstvo differencionno-integracionnyh mehanizmov razvitija special'nyh sposobnostej i kreativnosti v kontekste rosta nauchnyh znanij. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2014. V. 35. № 1. P. 54–70. (in Russian)

2. Vygotskii L.S. Osnovy defektologii. Saint Petersburg: Lan', 2003. (in Russian)

3. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Princip razvitija v psihologii. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2017. V. 38. № 4. P. 29–40. (in Russian)

4. Zimnjaja I.A. Lingvopsihologija rechevoj dejatel'nosti. Moscow: Moskovskij psihologo-social'nyj institut, Voronezh: NPO “MODJeK”, 2001. (in Russian)

5. Leont'ev A.A. Psiholingvisticheskie edinicy i porozhdenie rechevogo vyskazyvanija. Izd. 3-e, ster. Moscow: URSS, 2005. (in Russian)

6. Luman N. Differenciacija. Per. s nem. B. Skuratov. Moscow: Logos, 2006. (in Russian)

7. Medvedeva D.S., Hotinec V.Ju., Vjatkin B.A. Neravnovesnost' integracii i differenciacii rechemyslitel'nyh funkcij u detej-bilingvov v period posle doshkol'nogo vozrasta. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovanija sovremennoj psihologii: rezul'taty i perspektivy razvitija. Ed. A.L. Zhuravljov, V.A. Kol'cova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2017. P. 1354–1361. (in Russian)

8. Pogozhina I.N. Determinacija formirovanija i razvitija poznavatel'nyh struktur v sisteme postneklassicheskoj racional'nosti: Diss. … d-ra psihol. nauk. Moscow, 2016. (in Russian)

9. Podd'jakov A.N. Sravnitel'naja psihologija razvitija H. Vernera v sovremennom kontekste. Kul'turno-istoricheskaja psihologija. 2007. № 1. P. 63–72. (in Russian)

10. Podd'jakov N.N. Dominirovanie processov integracii v razvitii detej doshkol'nogo vozrasta. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 1997. V. 18. № 5. P. 103–111. (in Russian)

11. Hotinec V.Ju., Pletnikov A.I. Soglasovannost' individual'nyh i kul'turnyh cennostej kak faktor zashhishhennosti podrostkov ot bullinga v shkol'noj srede. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2018. V. 39. №4. P. 72–85. (in Russian)

12. Jasjukova L.A. Metodika opredelenija gotovnosti k shkole. Prognoz i profilaktika problem obuchenija v nachal'noj shkole. Metodicheskoe rukovodstvo. Saint Petersburg: GP IMATON, 2008. (in Russian)

13. Adesope O.O., Lavin T., Thompson T., Ungerleider C. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the cognitive correlates of bilingualism. Review of Educational Research. 2010. Vol. 80. N. 2. P. 207–245.

14. Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., Luk G. Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2008. Vol. 34. N. 4. Р. 859–873.

15. Bialystok E., Craik F.I.M., Klein R., Viswanathan M. Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: Evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 2004. Vol. 19. N. 2. Р. 290–303.

16. Bialystok E., Poarch G.J., Luo L., Craik F.I.M. Effects of bilingualism and aging on executive function and working memory. Psychology and aging. 2014. Vol. 29. N. 3. Р. 696–705.

17. Costa A., Hernandez M., Sebastian-Galles N. Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: evidence from the ANT task. Cognition. 2008. Vol. 106. N 1. P. 59–86.

18. Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. J.W. Berry et al. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

19. Cummins J. Language, Power, and Pedagogy: Bilingual Children in the Crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters, 2000.

20. Lehtonen M., Soveri A., Laine A., Järvenpää J., de Bruin A., Antfolk J. Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. 2018. Vol. 144. N. 4. P. 394–425.

21. Neuropsychological, cognitive, and theoretical considerations for evaluation of bilingual individuals. M.R. Mindt, A. Arentoft et al.. Neuropsychology Review. 2008. Vol. 18. N. 3. P. 255–268.

22. Ricciardelli L.A. Bilingualism and cognitive development in relation to threshold theory. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 1992. Vol. 21. N. 4. P. 301–316.

23. Skutnabb-Kangas T., May S. Linguistic Human Rights in Education. T. McCarty, S. May (Ed.). Language Policy and Political Issues in Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. 2017. P. 125–141.

24. Trudell B. Language choice, education and community identity. International Journal of Educational Development. 2005. Vol. 25. N. 3. P. 237–251.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate