Analysis of modern concepts in psychology part I. Experience in systematization of conceptsal
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Analysis of modern concepts in psychology part I. Experience in systematization of conceptsal
Annotation
PII
S020595920015130-9-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
A. Zhuravlev 
Occupation: Professor, Scientific Adviser of Institute of Psychology RAS
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, building 1
E. Sergienko
Occupation: Chief researcher of the laboratory of psychology of development of the subject in normal and post-traumatic States
Affiliation: Federal State-financed Establishment of Science, Institute of Psychology RAS
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, building 1
Pages
5-15
Abstract

The purpose of the articles was to analyze modern concepts in psychological science using the example of the developments of scientists from the Institute of Psychology of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The first article is devoted to the comparison of the experience of classification of concepts in Russian psychology (K.K. Platonov, Ya.A. Ponomarev, L.I. Antsyferova, A.V. Petrovsky, M.G. Yaroshevsky, V.A. subsequent (in the second article) analysis of modern concepts. The comparison of the terms “category” and “concept” is carried out. Comparison of ideas about K.K. Platonov with the conceptual grid of A.V. Petrovsky and M.G. Yaroshevsky showed that they are based on common principles of historical and genetic analysis. The previous classification of Platonov contains the basic ideas of determinism, consistency and hierarchy, developed in detail in the conceptual grid of Petrovsky and Yaroshevsky. The ideas of Ya.A. Ponomarev and L.I. Antsyferova in the development of psychological categories. The experience of systematizing concepts has shown that, despite the harmony and constructiveness of the ideas of predecessors, one should point out the impossibility of considering psychological concepts in their coordinates, which is associated with a change in general scientific methodological principles: the transition from classical to non-classical and post-non-classical methodology of metamodernity. The interpenetration and mutual influence of psychological approaches in psychological science, the growth of inter- and polyparadigmality in modern psychology are shown. The first article allows you to identify and compare the coordinates of the analysis of previous scientists and determine the trends of modern changes. From these positions, the authors refer specifically to the conceptual system of psychology, and not to general psychological categories and principles. The conceptual field of science, including psychology, demonstrates development and transformation, mobility and fluidity much more clearly than general categories or principles. The conceptual structure most clearly reveals the dynamics of the development of science, which makes this link of the methodological system more demonstrative for analyzing changes at the present stage.

Keywords
concepts, categories, classification of concepts, conceptual network, general psychological concepts, particular psychological concepts, interparadigmality, interdisciplinarity, metamodernism, subjectivity of concepts
Received
12.06.2021
Date of publication
12.06.2021
Number of purchasers
6
Views
293
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S020595920015130-9-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 19.05.2021
Cite Download pdf

References

1. Anan'ev B.G. O problemah sovremennogo chelovekoznaniya. Moscow: Nauka, 1977. (in Russian)

2. Ancyferova L.I. Materialisticheskaya dialektika i psihologicheskaya nauka (Vmesto predisloviya). Kategorii materialisticheskoj dialektiki v psihologii. Ed. L.I. Ancyferova. Moscow: Nauka, 1988. P. 3−21. (in Russian)

3. Asmolov A.G. Psihologiya lichnosti: Kul'turno-istoricheskoe ponimanie razvitiya cheloveka. 3-e izd., ispr. i dop. Moscow: Smysl: Izdatel'skij centr “Akademiya”, 2007. (in Russian)

4. Gusel'ceva M.S. Kul'turnaya psihologiya: metodologiya, istoriya, perspektivy. Moscow: Prometej, 2007. (in Russian)

5. Gusel'ceva M.S. Evolyuciya psihologicheskogo znaniya v smene tipov racional'nosti. Moscow: Akropol', 2013. (in Russian)

6. Gusel'ceva M.S. Princip razvitiya v psihologii: vyzovy poliparadigmal'nosti i transcisciplinarnosti. Princip razvitiya v sovremennoj psihologii. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016. P. 31−61. (in Russian)

7. Gusel'ceva M.S. Perspektivy razvitiya psihologicheskogo znaniya: blesk i nishcheta prognozov. Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 628−670. (in Russian)

8. Gusel'ceva M.S., Izotova E.I. Pozitivnaya socializaciya detej i podrostkov: metodologiya i empirika. Moscow: Smysl, 2016. (in Russian)

9. Zhuravlev A.L., Sergienko E.A. Sovremennye ponyatiya v psihologicheskoj nauke: popytka analiza. Razrabotka ponyatij sovremennoj psihologii. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 5−62. (in Russian)

10. Zelenkova T.V. Integrativnye tendencii v razvitii psihologii: ot monologa k polilogu. Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevicha. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 332−367. (in Russian)

11. Kratkij slovar' po filosofii. Pod obshch. red. I.V. Blauberga, I.K. Pantina, 3-e izd., dorabot. i dop. Moscow: Politizdat, 1979. (in Russian)

12. Leont'ev D.A., Ovchinnikova U.YU., Rasskazova E.I., Fam A.H. Psihologiya vybora. Moscow: Smysl, 2015. (in Russian)

13. Lomov B.F. Metodologicheskie i teoreticheskie problemy psihologii. Moscow: Nauka, 1984. (in Russian)

14. Marcinkovskaya T.D. Problema socializacii v istoriko-geneticheskoj paradigme. Moscow: Smysl, 2015. (in Russian)

15. Novoe v naukah o cheloveke: k 85-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya akademika I.T. Frolova. Ed. G.I. Belkina; red. sost. M.I. Frolova. Moscow: Lenand, 2015. (in Russian)

16. Petrovskij A.V., Petrovskij V.A. Kategorial'naya sistema psihologii. Voprosy psihologii. 2000. №. 5. P. 3−17. (in Russian)

17. Petrovskij A.V., Yaroshevskij M.G. Osnovy teoreticheskoj psihologii. Moscow: INFRA-M, 1998. (in Russian)

18. Petrovskij A.V., Yaroshevskij M.G. Teoreticheskaya psihologiya: Uchebnoe posobie dlya stud. Psih. fak. Vyssh. ucheb. zavedenij. Moscow: Izdatel'skij centr “Akademiya”, 2001. 496 p. (in Russian)

19. Platonov K.K. O sisteme psihologii. Moscow: Mysl', 1972. (in Russian)

20. Platonov K.K. Sistema psihologii i teoriya otrazheniya. Moscow: Nauka, 1982. (in Russian)

21. Ponomarev Ya.A. Metodologicheskoe vvedenie v psihologiyu. Moscow: Izd-vo Nauka. 1983. (in Russian)

22. Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 332−367. (in Russian)

23. Princip razvitiya v sovremennoj psihologii. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2016. (in Russian)

24. Razrabotka ponyatij sovremennoj psihologii. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, E.A. Sergienko. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. (in Russian)

25. Sergienko E.A. Mezhparadigmal'nye mosty. Psihologicheskie issledovaniya. 2016. V. 9. № 48. P. 4. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 29.10.2016). (in Russian)

26. Sergienko E.A. Ot differenciacii k integracii podhodov i kategorij v sovremennom psihologicheskom znanii. Psihologicheskoe znanie: Sovremennoe sostoyanie i perspektivy razvitiya. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, A.V. Yurevich. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2018. P. 308−331. (in Russian)

27. Holodnaya M.A. Strukturno-integrativnaya metodologiya v issledovanii intellekta. Differencionno-integracionnaya teoriya razvitiya. Sost. N.I. CHuprikova, A.D. Koshelev. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskih kul'tur, 2011. P. 469−477. (in Russian)

28. Holodnaya M.A. Struktura i funkcii estestvennogo intellekta v kontekste problemy iskusstvennogo intellekta. Iskusstvennyj intellekt: mezhdisciplinarnyj podhod. Ed. D.I. Dubrovskogo i V.A. Lektorskogo. Moscow: IIteLL, 2006. P. 149−162. (in Russian)

29. Holodnaya M.A. Psihologiya ponyatijnogo myshleniya: Ot konceptual'nyh struktur k ponyatijnym sposobnostyam. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2012. (in Russian)

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate