Везде
Social comparison orientation and subjective perception of fashion
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Social comparison orientation and subjective perception of fashion
Annotation
PII
S020595920015131-0-
DOI
10.31857/S020595920015131-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
N. Artemtseva 
Occupation: Senior Research Associate
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences. Laboratory of Cognitive Processes and Mathematical Psychology
Address: Moscow, Yaroslavskaya str., 13, bldn. 1
E. Samoylenko
Occupation: Chief researcher, laboratory of cognitive processes and mathematical psychology
Affiliation: Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Yaroslavskaya St., 13
Edition
Volume 42 issue 3
Pages
16-26
Abstract

The article concerns relationship of indicators of social comparison orientation and appearance comparison orientation with the peculiarities of subjective attitude to fashion. Social comparison orientation was assessed with the ROOSS questionnaire, appearance comparison orientation – with the PACS-R, and subjective attitude to fashion – with the SHOM scale. The study involved 166 Moscow students receiving education in psychology, commodity science, management and service, sociology, economic security, and art history. The hypothesis was that the attitude to fashion, which sets the constantly changing norms of appearance design in a certain socio-cultural context, is interconnected with how much a person is inclined to social comparison. It was found that the higher were the orientation toward comparison in appearance, the general orientation toward social comparison, as well as specific types of orientation toward comparing oneself with acquaintances and strangers, the higher was the attitude toward fashion as a multidimensional sociocultural phenomenon. It was revealed that indicators of appearance comparison orientation, of social comparison orientation and its subtypes are interrelated with assessments concerning a number of specific statements reflecting attitudes toward fashion. The largest number of statistically significant relationships was found for participants representing the sociology and management and service specializations.

Keywords
social comparison orientation, appearance comparison, psychology of fashion
Acknowledgment
The study was carried out within the framework of the State Assignment, project № 0138-2021-0006. Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation
Received
28.05.2021
Date of publication
12.06.2021
Number of purchasers
6
Views
313
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S020595920015131-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 19.05.2021
Cite Download pdf

References

1. Artemceva N.G., Grekova T.N. Metodika “Shkala otnosheniya k mode” (SHOM) kak diagnostika lichnostnykh predstavleniy o mode. Gumanitarnyye osnovaniya sotsial'nogo progressa: Rossiya i sovremennost'. Sbornik statey Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii. Moscow: Ministerstvo obrazovaniya i nauki RF; Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet dizayna i tekhnologii. 2016. P. 18−24. (in Russian)

2. Gofman A.B. Moda i lyudi. Novaya teoriya mody i modnogo povedeniya. Moscow: KDU, 2015. (in Russian)

3. Zhuravlev A.L., Ushakov V.D., Yurevich A.V. Mentalitet, obshchestvo i psikhosotsial'nyy chelovek (otvet uchastnikam diskussii). Psihologicheskij zhurnal. V. 38. № 1. 2017. P. 107−112. (in Russian)

4. Kiloshenko M.I. Moda i YA-kontseptsiya. Psihologiya mody. Ed. I.V. Antonenko, I.N. Karickogo. Moscow: RGU im. A.N. Kosygina, 2019. P. 34−47. (in Russian)

5. Labunskaya V.A. Osobennosti samootnosheniya devushek -uchastnic kastingov, otlichayushchihsya ocenkami krasoty vneshnego oblika. Psiholog. 2017. № 5. P. 33−45. (in Russian)

6. Psihologiya mody. Ed. I.V. Antonenko, I.N. Karickogo. Moscow: RGU im. A.N. Kosygina, 2019. (in Russian)

7. Ramendik D.M. Vospriyatie odezhdy i mody: kognitivnye i social'no-psihologicheskie factory. Psihologiya mody. Ed. I.V. Antonenko, I.N. Karickogo. Moscow: RGU im. A.N. Kosygina, 2019. P. 47−56. (in Russian)

8. Samoylenko E.S., Savchenko T.N., Korbut A.V. Metodicheskij instrument izmereniya orientirovannosti na vidy social'nogo sravneniya. Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya sovremennoj psihologii: rezul'taty i perspektivy razvitiya. Ed. A.L. Zhuravlev, V.A. Kol'tcova. Moscow: Izd-vo “Institut psihologii RAN”, 2017. P. 532−541. (in Russian)

9. Buunk A.P., Gibbons F.X., Dijkstra P., Krizan Z. Individual differences in social comparison. The complex effects of social comparison orientation. Social comparison, judgment, and behavior. Eds. J. Suls, R.L. Collins, L. Wheeler. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. P. 77–104.

10. Buunk A.P., Peiro J.M., Griffioen C. A positive role model may stimulate career-oriented behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2007. V. 37. № 7. P. 1489–1500.

11. Entwistle J. The fashioned body: Fashion, dress and social theory. – John Wiley & Sons, 2015.

12. Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations. 1954. 7. P. 117–140.

13. Gibbons F.X., Buunk A.P. Individual differences in social comparison: development and validation of a measure of social comparison orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999. V. 76. № 1. P. 129–142.

14. Klein W.M., Weinstein N.D. Social comparison and unrealistic optimism about personal risk. Health, coping and well-being: Perspectives from social comparison theory. Eds. A.P. Buunk, F.X. Gibbons. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum, 1997. P. 25–61.

15. Kruglanski A.W., Mayseless O. Classic and current social comparison research: expanding the perspective. Psychological Bulletin. 1990. V. 108. № 2. P. 195–208.

16. Litt D.M., Stock M.L., Gibbons F.X. Adolescent alcohol use: Social comparison orientation moderates the impact of friend and sibling behavior. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2015. V. 20. № 3. P. 514–533.

17. Mair C. The Psychology of Fashion. Routledge, 2018.

18. McNeill L. S. Fashion and women’s self-concept: a typology for self-fashioning using clothing. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal. 2018. V. 22. №1. P. 82–98.

19. O’Brien K.S., Caputi P., Minto R., Peoples G., Hooper C., Kell S., Sawley E. Upward and downward physical appearance comparisons: Development of scales and examination of predictive qualities. Body Image. 2009. № 6. P. 201–206.

20. Schaefer L.M. The Development and Validation of the Physical Appearance Comparison Scale-Revised (PACS-R). A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences. University of South Florida. 2013.

21. Semerjian T., Stephens D. Comparison style, physical self-perceptions, and fitness among older women. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity. 2007. V. 15. № 2. P. 219–235.

22. Sun Y., Guo S. Predicting fashion involvement by media use, social comparison, and lifestyle: An interaction model. International Journal of Communication. 2017. V. 11. P. 4559–4582.

23. Thompson J.K., Heinberg L.J., Altabe, M., Tantleff-Dunn S. Exacting Beauty. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. 1999.

24. Thompson J.K., Heinberg L., Tantleff S. The physical appearance comparison scale (PACS). The Behavior Therapist. 1991. № 14. P. 174.

25. White J.B., Langer E.J., Yariv L., Welch J C., IV. Frequent social comparisons and destructive emotions and behaviors: The dark side of social comparisons. Journal of Adult Development. 2006. № 13. P. 36–44.

26. Wood J.V. What is social comparison and how should we study it? Personality and social psychology bulletin. 1996. V. 22. № 5. P. 520–537.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate