Президиум РАНВопросы истории естествознания и техники

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9606
  • ISSN (Online)2713-041X

China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the Sino-US strategic rivalry: Implications and the main US response [Китайская инициатива «Один пояс, один путь» в китайско-американском стратегическом соперничестве: последствия и реакция США]

Код статьи
S032150750018982-2-
DOI
10.31857/S032150750018982-2
Тип публикации
Статья
Статус публикации
Опубликовано
Авторы
Том/ Выпуск
Том / Выпуск №10
Страницы
65-72
Аннотация

Китайско-американские отношения столкнулись с беспрецедентным вызовом и ухудшились до самой низкой точки за четыре десятилетия во время президентства Д.Трампа. В значительной степени «стратегическое соперничество» стало основным тоном нового раунда стратегических корректировок США в отношении Китая. Китайская инициатива «Один пояс, один путь» (ОПОП), которую многие американские ученые интерпретируют как продукт большой стратегии Китая, также становится главной целью этого «стратегического соперничества».

Ключевые слова
китайско-американские отношения, стратегическое соперничество, инициатива «Пояс и путь», Индо-Тихоокеанская стратегия, администрация Трампа, администрация Байдена
Дата публикации
11.11.2022
Всего подписок
12
Всего просмотров
548

Библиография

  1. 1. Johnson C.K. President Xi Jinping’s ‘Belt and Road’ initiative. Center for Strategic and International Studies. 2016. 28. Pp. 1-24.
  2. 2. Dyer G. Obama Says AIIB Could Be ‘Positive’ for Asia. Financial Times, April 28, 2015. https://www.ft.com/content/80271e0c-eddc-11e4-90d2-00144feab7de (accessed 18.07.2022)
  3. 3. Chance A. American Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative: Source of Concern, possibilities for US-China cooperation. Institute for China-America studies. November 2016. https://chinaus-icas.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/American-Perspectives-on-the-Belt-and-Road-Initiative.pdf (accessed 28.07.2022)
  4. 4. Panda A. 6 Major Takeaways from Indian PM Narendra Modi’s First Summit with Donald Trump. https://thediplomat.com/2017/06/6-major-takeaways-from-indian-pm-narendra-modi-first-summit-with-donald-trump/ (accessed 30.07.2022)
  5. 5. Russel D., Berger B. Weaponizing the Belt and Road Initiative. Asia Society Policy Institute. 2020. https://asiasociety.org/sites/default/files/202009/Weaponizing%20the%20Belt%20and%20Road%20Initiative_0.pdf (accessed 12.07.2022)
  6. 6. Tillerson R.W. Defining Our Relationship with India for the Next Century, Remarks at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. October 18, 2017. Pp. 7-8.
  7. 7. Remarks by Vice President Pence at the 2018 APEC CEO Summit, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea, November 16, 2018. https://kr.usembassy.gov/111618-remarks-by-vice-president-pence-at-the-2018-apec-ceo-summit/ (accessed 28.07.2022)
  8. 8. OBOR partially aims to marginalise US influence in Pacific: Admiral Harry Harris. The Economic Times. March 16, 2018. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/obor-partially-aims-to-marginalise-us-influence-in-pacific-top-us-admiral/articleshow/63330657.cms?from=mdr (accessed 05.07.2022)
  9. 9. Advance Policy Questions for Admiral Philip Davidson. Hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee. April 17, 2018. https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Davidson_APQs_04-17-18.pdf (accessed 10.07.2022)
  10. 10. Senate Hearing “Global Challenges and US national security strategy”. Senate Committee on Armed Services. January 25, 2018. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-115shrg39552/html/CHRG-115shrg39552.htm (accessed 29.07.2022)
  11. 11. Hearing on China’s Belt and Road Initiative. US Senate on Finance. June 12, 2019. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/43886.pdf (accessed 30.07.2022)
  12. 12. Murray C. An analysis of China’s Belt and Road initiative and its neo-colonial ambitions. Routes. 2022. 2(3). Pp. 176-182; Kleven A. Belt and Road: colonialism with Chinese characteristics. Lowy Institute. May 6, 2019. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/belt-and-road-colonialism-chinese-characteristics (accessed 29.07.2022)
  13. 13. Gondon D., Tong H.Y., Anderson T. Beyond the Myths - Towards a Realistic Assessment of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: The Security Dimension. The International Institute for Strategic Studies. 2020.
  14. 14. Cheng G. China’s Digital Silk Road in the age of the digital economy: Political analysis. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2022. 22(2). Pp. 271-287. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-271-287
  15. 15. Carrai M.A. The Rise of Screening Mechanisms in the Global North: Weaponizing the Law against China’s Weaponized Investment. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law. 2020. Vol. 8. Issue 2. Pp. 351-383.
  16. 16. Zhu Z.Can the Quad Counter China’s Belt and Road Initiative? The Diplomat. March 14, 2018. https://thediplomat.com/2018/03/can-the-quad-counter-chinas-belt-and-road-initiative/ (accessed 29.07.2022)
  17. 17. Cheng G., Chen L., Degterev, D.A. Geopolitical Implications of China’s “One Belt One Road” Strategy. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations. 2019. 19 (1). Pp. 77-88. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-1-77-88
  18. 18. National Security Strategy of the United States of America. The White House. December 18, 2017. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf (accessed 30.07.2022)
  19. 19. Feng Y., Gabuev A., Haenle P., Ma B., Trenin D. The Belt and Road Initiative: Views from Washington, Moscow, and Beijing. Carnegie Center. April 8, 2019. https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/04/08/belt-and-road-initiative-views-from-washington-moscow-and-beijing-pub-78774 (accessed 15.07.2022)
  20. 20. Hu M., Meng W. The US Indo-Pacific Strategy and China’s Response. China Review. 2020. Vol. 20. № 3. Pp. 143-176.
  21. 21. Lew J.J., Roughead G. China’s Belt and Road: Implications for the United States. Council on Foreign Relations. Independent Task Force Report № 79. 2021. https://www.cfr.org/report/chinas-belt-and-road-implications-for-the-united-states/download/pdf/2021-04/TFR%20%2379_China%27s%20Belt%20and%20Road_Implications%20for%20the%20United%20States_FINAL.pdf (accessed 31.07.2022)
  22. 22. Chacko P., Wilson J. Australia, Japan and India: A trilateral coalition in the IndoPacific? Perth, US Asia Center. September 2020. 38 p.
  23. 23. S.1169 - Strategic Competition Act of 2021. US Senate Foreign Relations Committee. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1169/text (accessed 31.07.2022)
  24. 24. S.1260 - United States Innovation and Competition Act of 2021. Senate Committees on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/1260/text (accessed 30.07.2022)
  25. 25. Wells D., Garrison J. House passes COMPETES Act bill aimed at boosting US competitiveness with China. USA Today. February 4, 2022. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2022/02/04/house-passes-america-competes-act-aimed-competing-china/6641085001/ (accessed 31.07.2022)
  26. 26. Zhao M.H. The Belt and Road Initiative and China-US strategic competition. China International Strategy Review. 2021. 3(2). Pp. 248-260. DOI: 10.1007/s42533-021-00087-7
  27. 27. Li X. “Summit for Democracy”: a symbol of the new “iron curtain”. Global Times. December 12, 2021. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202112/1241306.shtml (accessed 31.07.2022)
QR
Перевести

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Высшая аттестационная комиссия

При Министерстве образования и науки Российской Федерации

Scopus

Научная электронная библиотека