RAS PresidiumВопросы истории естествознания и техники Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9606
  • ISSN (Online) 2713-041X

Administrative enforcement in the antimonopoly sphere: legal policy issues

PII
S102694520022604-5-
DOI
10.31857/S102694520022604-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 10
Pages
108-115
Abstract

The article considers the modern legal policy in the antimonopoly sphere in terms of the establishment and application of administrative coercion measures. The relevance of the study is determined by the fact that the effectiveness of the antimonopoly policy of the state depends on the state of development of administrative enforcement tools, since administrative enforcement measures provide prevention, suppression of anticompetitive actions, punishment of perpetrators. The aim is to determine the content, objectives of legal policy and factors that reduce the quality of its implementation in this direction. Strategic planning in the antimonopoly sphere is analyzed and critically evaluated, insufficient specification of prospects for improving administrative-preventive and administrative-preventive mechanisms, considered as key instruments of antimonopoly policy, is revealed.

Keywords
administrative coercion, antimonopoly sphere, legal policy, administrative responsibility, antimonopoly authority, competition protection, monopolistic activity, legal regulation, public administration, strategic planning
Date of publication
24.11.2022
Year of publication
2022
Number of purchasers
13
Views
672

References

  1. 1. Administrative Law of the Russian Federation: textbook for bachelors / ed. by A. Yu. Sokolov. 2nd ed., reprint and add. M., 2018. P. 173, 174 (in Russ.).
  2. 2. Afinogenov D.A., Vinogradova E.V., Polyakova T.A. Development of state policy in the field of strategic planning in the Russian Federation: public-legal and scientific-methodological problems and priorities // Legal policy and legal life. 2021. No. 4. P. 27 (in Russ.).
  3. 3. Bashlakov-Nikolaev I.V. Coercive measures in the field of competition protection // Financial Law and management. 2015. No. 3. P. 312. DOI: 10.7256/2310-0508.2015.3.15080 (in Russ.).
  4. 4. Borzilo E. Yu. Warnings and cautions of the antimonopoly authority as a tool of legal regulation in Russia // Business. Education. Law. 2016. No. 1 (34). P. 193 (in Russ.).
  5. 5. Grishkovets A.A. Federal executive authorities and other entities regulating the economy // Legal policy and legal life. 2020. No. 3. P. 70 (in Russ.).
  6. 6. Dekhtyar I.N. Proceedings on cases of violations of antimonopoly legislation. Saratov, 2018. P. 4 (in Russ.).
  7. 7. Kinev A. Yu. Administrative and legal protection of competition: problems and ways of improvement: dis. ... Doctor of Law. M., 2015. P. 177 (in Russ.).
  8. 8. Konin N.M. Administrative Law of Russia. General and Special parts: a course of lectures. M., 2004. P. 198 (in Russ.).
  9. 9. Krotov K.S. Administrative responsibility for offenses in the field of competition protection: dis. ... PhD in Law. Saratov, 2020. P. 56 (in Russ.).
  10. 10. Kulapov V.L., Malko A.V. Theory of state and law: textbook. M., 2022. P. 371 (in Russ.).
  11. 11. Mal’ko A.V., Gayvoronskaya Ya. V. Doctrinal acts as the main instrument of legal policy // Law. HSE Journal. 2018. No. 1. P. 7. DOI: 10.17323/2072-8166.2018.1.4.25 (in Russ.).
  12. 12. Petrov D.A. Competition Law: studies. and a workshop for academies. bachelor's and master’s degrees. 2nd ed., reprint and add. M., 2019. P. 120–241 (in Russ.).
  13. 13. Pisenko K.A. Administrative and legal support of the balance of interests in the field of antimonopoly regulation in the Russian Federation: dis. ... Doctor of Law. M., 2018. P. 4 - 6 (in Russ.).
  14. 14. Saidov Z.A., Yastrebov O.A. Private legal interests in the economy and problems of administrative and legal impact on them // Herald of the RUDN. Ser.: Legal Sciences. 2015. No. 3. P. 18 (in Russ.).
  15. 15. Glasner D., Sullivan S.P. The Logic of Market Definition // Antitrust Law Journal. 2020. Vol. 83. No. 2. P. 302.
  16. 16. Leslie C.R. Antitrust Law as Public Interest Law // UC Irvine Law Review. 2012. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 886.
  17. 17. Masur J.S., Posner E.A. Norming in Administrative Law // Duke Law Journal. 2019. Vol. 68. No. 7. P. 1421.
  18. 18. Melamed A.D. Antitrust law and its critics // Antitrust Law Journal. 2020. Vol. 83. No. 1. P. 269.
  19. 19. Rosenfeld E., Veil J. Sanctions administratives, sanctions pénales // Pouvoirs: Revue d'Etudes Constitutionnelles et Politiques. 2009. Vol. 128. No. 1. P. 61.
  20. 20. Sullivan S.P. Modular Market Definition // UC Davis Law Review. 2021. Vol. 55. No. 2. P. 1147.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library