RAS PresidiumВопросы истории естествознания и техники Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9606
  • ISSN (Online) 2713-041X

About the legal nature, principles and legal status of participants in the judicial conciliation procedure

PII
S102694520022613-5-
DOI
10.31857/S102694520022613-5
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 10
Pages
18-30
Abstract

The article is devoted to the consideration of questions about the legal nature of the institution of judicial conciliation, its principles, the legal status of a judicial conciliator, the procedural rights and obligations of participants in judicial conciliation in civil and arbitration proceedings. The author proceeds from the fact that the judicial conciliation procedure is implemented within the framework of civil, arbitration and administrative legal proceedings, regulated by the norms of procedural legislation, due to which it is a kind of public law activity. Accordingly, a conclusion is made about the public powers of the judicial conciliator and the “vertical” nature of the relationship connecting him with the parties to the legal conflict during the judicial conciliation procedure. At the same time, attention is drawn to the specific nature of the direction of judicial reconciliation (not the resolution of the conflict, but its settlement), as well as the specific principles of this procedure (confidentiality). The procedural rights and obligations of the parties to judicial reconciliation, which are derived from the general rights and obligations of the parties in arbitration proceedings, are analyzed. The question of the relationship between the principles of judicial conciliation procedure and the general principles of civil and arbitration proceedings is also considered. Unlike out-of-court conciliation, judicial conciliation procedures are part of the general civil procedural form, therefore their organization and conduct must be carried out in accordance with the principles of civil and arbitration process.

Keywords
civil process, arbitration process, out-of-court conciliation, judicial conciliation, judicial conciliation procedure, judicial conciliator, participants in judicial conciliation proceedings, parties to judicial conciliation, procedural rights and obligations of participants in judicial conciliation proceedings, principles of civil and arbitration legal proceedings
Date of publication
24.11.2022
Year of publication
2022
Number of purchasers
14
Views
570

References

  1. 1. Alekseev S.S. Theory of law. M., 1995. P. 265 (in Russ.).
  2. 2. Arbitration process: textbook / ed. by V.V. Yarkov. 2nd ed., reprint and add. M., 2003. P. 211 (in Russ.).
  3. 3. Vaskovsky E.V. Textbook of civil procedure. M., 2003. P. 179, 180 (in Russ.).
  4. 4. Golmsten A. Kh. Textbook of Russian civil procedure. 5th ed., rev. and add. St. Petersburg, 1913. P. 141 (in Russ.).
  5. 5. Grafsky V.G. Principles of legality and justice in the history of legislation of Russia and Western European states // Proceedings of the ISL of the RAS. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 6. P. 15 (in Russ.).
  6. 6. Gukasyan R.E. Selected works on civil procedure. M., 2008. P. 55 (in Russ.).
  7. 7. Ermoshin G.T. Retired judge: status, rights, duties // Law. HSE Journal. 2012. No. 4. P. 88 (in Russ.).
  8. 8. Kalinovsky K.B. Legality and types of criminal proceedings: dis. ... PhD in Law. SPb., 1999 (in Russ.).
  9. 9. Kozachenko I. Ya., Sergeev D.N., Vasiliev A.M. Reconciliation in law: compromise or concession? Review of the 17th International Scientific and Practical Conference in memory of M.I. Kovalev // Russian law: education, practice, science. 2020. No. 3. P. 111 (in Russ.).
  10. 10. Limar T.G. The legal basis for the implementation of conciliation procedures in civil disputes // Herald of the SSSA. 2018. No. 6 (125). P. 139 (in Russ.).
  11. 11. Mishchenko E.V., Letuta T.V. Principles of judicial reconciliation, mediation and arbitration: comparative legal aspect // Russian law: education, practice, science. 2019. No. 2. P. 6 (in Russ.).
  12. 12. Moiseev S.V. Understanding the principle of dispositivity in the arbitration process // Herald of the Moscow University. Ser. 11 “Law”. 2008. No. 1. P. 14 (in Russ.).
  13. 13. Scientific and practical commentary on the CPC of the RSFSR / ed. by R.F. Kallistratova, L.F. Lesnitskaya, V.K. Puchinsky. M., 1976. P. 55 (in Russ.).
  14. 14. Nefediev E.A. Textbook of Russian civil procedure. 3rd ed. M., 1908. P. 5 (in Russ.).
  15. 15. Osipov Yu. K. Elements and stages of application of the norms of Soviet Civil Procedural Law // A brief anthology of the Ural procedural thought: 55 years of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law Academy / ed. by V.V. Yarkov. Ekaterinburg, 2004 (in Russ.).
  16. 16. Dictionary of foreign words and expressions / author-comp. N.V. Coward, T.G. Shubina. Minsk, 1997. P. 389 (in Russ.).
  17. 17. Chechina N.A. Elected proceedings on civil procedure. SPb., 2004. P. 21 (in Russ.).
  18. 18. Chechot D.M. Elected proceedings on civil procedure. SPb., 2005. P. 89 (in Russ.).
  19. 19. Shakaryan M.S. Elected proceedings. SPb., 2014. P. 578 (in Russ.).
  20. 20. Sherstyuk V.M. Theoretical problems of the development of Civil Procedural, Arbitration Procedural Law and enforcement proceedings in the Russian Federation. M., 2021. P. 123 (in Russ.).
  21. 21. Yaroshenko T.V. The principle of dispositivity in civil procedure as a continuation of dispositive principles in civil substantive law // Herald of Kant BFU. Ser.: Humanities and social sciences. 2006. No. 9. P. 24–30 (in Russ.).
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library