Везде

RAS PresidiumVoprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9606
  • ISSN (Online)2713-041X

From self-driving drones to autonomous drones: a range of socio-ethical risks

You can
PII
S207054760022754-6-
DOI
10.18254/S207054760022754-6
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Marianna Sokolova
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue 5
Pages
0
Abstract

The article discusses a number of ethical conflicts related to the imperfection of recognition and decision-making algorithmization technologies based on the experience of the USA, Russia and China. Special attention is paid to social risks and the institutionalization of algorithmic ethics. The role of the risks of using autonomous weapons, shock autonomous UAVs is emphasized (the Maven project, USA). Using the example of the conflict between the American researcher Timnit Gebru and the Google managers, the institutional risks of researchers are considered. Using the example of strikes by Gig workers of Chinese digital food delivery platforms, it is shown to what social risks business algorithms can lead to if the interests of workers are not taken into account. 

Keywords
algorithms, ethics of algorithms, institutionalization of AI ethics, artificial intelligence (AI), UAVs, autonomous drones, autonomous weapons
Date of publication
24.10.2022
Number of purchasers
11
Views
308

References

  1. 1. Pravovye aspekty ispol'zovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta: aktual'nye problemy i vozmozhnye resheniya: doklad NIU VShEh. M.: Izdatel'skij dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2021. S.36.
  2. 2. Khabrieva T.Ya. Pravo, iskusstvennyj intellekt, tsifrovizatsiya. Chelovek i sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta. SPb., 2022. S. 74-75.
  3. 3. Khabrieva T.Ya. Pravo, iskusstvennyj intellekt, tsifrovizatsiya. Chelovek i sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta. SPb, 2022. S. 74-75.
  4. 4. Larson J., Mattu S., Kirchner L., Angwin J. How We Analyzed the COMPAS Recidivism Algorithm. 23.05.2016. Available at: https://www.propublica.org/article/how-we-analyzed-the-compas-recidivism-algorithm (accessed 2.11.2021).
  5. 5. Khalid A. Google’s AI for mammograms doesn’t account for racial differences. Quartz. 9.11.2020. Available at: https://qz.com/1781123/googles-ai-for-mammograms-doesnt-account-for-race (accessed 2.01.2022).
  6. 6. Kelly C. J. et al. Key challenges for delivering clinical impact with artificial intelligence. BMC medicine. – 2019. – Vol. 17. – №. 1. – PP. 1-9.
  7. 7. Roberts H., Cowls J., Morley J., Taddeo M., Wang V., Floridi L. The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: an Analysis of Policy and Regulation. 2021. AI & SOCIETY. 36 (3). S. 17. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2 (accessed 2.05.2022).
  8. 8. Kinyakina E., Kurasheva A. Telemeditsina ne nashla podderzhki u Minzdrava. Vedomosti. 18.07.2022. Available at: https://www.vedomosti.ru/technology/articles/2022/07/20/932329-telemeditsina-podderzhki (accessed 2.01.2020).
  9. 9. Fatić A. The ethics of drone warfare // Filozofija I Društvo. XXVIII (2), 2017. P. 351.
  10. 10. Mizokami K. Autonomous Drones Have Attacked Humans. Popularmechanics. 22.05.2022. Available at: https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a36559508/drones-autonomously-attacked-humans-libya-united-nations-report/ (accessed 2.06.2022).
  11. 11. Kokoshin A.A. Voprosy primeneniya tekhnologij i sistem iskusstvennogo intellekta v voennoj sfere Chelovek i sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta. SPb., 2022. S.101.
  12. 12. Kallenborn Z. If a killer robot were used, would we know? The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 4.06.2022. Available at: https://thebulletin.org/2021/06/if-a-killer-robot-were-used-would-we-know/#post-heading (accessed 6.06.2022).
  13. 13. Kallenborn Z. Giving an AI control of nuclear weapons: What could possibly go wrong? The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1.02.2022. Available at: https://thebulletin.org/2022/02/giving-an-ai-control-of-nuclear-weapons-what-could-possibly-go-wrong/#post-heading (accessed 27.06.2022).
  14. 14. Kallenborn Z. Swarn talk: Understanding drone typology. The Modern War Institute (MWI). 12.10.21. Available at: https://mwi.usma.edu/about-3 (accessed 27.03.2022).
  15. 15. Kokoshin A.A. Voprosy primeneniya tekhnologij i sistem iskusstvennogo intellekta v voennoj sfere. Chelovek i sistemy iskusstvennogo intellekta. SPb., 2022. S. 101.
  16. 16. Establishment of an Algorithmic Warfare Cross-Functional Team (Project Maven). 26.04.2017. Available at: https://www.govexec.com/media/gbc/docs/pdfs_edit/establishment_of_the_awcft_project_maven.pdf (accessed 27.06.2022).
  17. 17. Weisgerber M. The Pentagon’s New Algorithmic Warfare Cell Gets Its First Mission: Hunt ISIS 14.05.2017. Available at: https://www.defenseone.com/technology/2017/05/pentagons-new-algorithmic-warfare-cell-gets-its-first-mission-hunt-isis/137833 (accessed 27.01.2022).
  18. 18. Johnson T., Wald Ch.W. The Military Should Teach AI to Watch Drone Footage Opinion. 26.11.2017. Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/the-military-should-teach-ai-to-watch-drone-footage (accessed 5.05.2022).
  19. 19. Steinhardt J., Wei Koh P., Liang P. Certified Defenses for Data Poisoning Attacks. 26.11.2017. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.03691 (accessed 7.04.2022).
  20. 20. Kallenborn Z. Giving an AI control of nuclear weapons: What could possibly go wrong? The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. 1.02.2022. Available at: https://thebulletin.org/2022/02/giving-an-ai-control-of-nuclear-weapons-what-could-possibly-go-wrong/#post-heading (accessed 27.01.2022)
  21. 21. Simonite T. Google and Microsoft That AI May Do Dumb Things 02.11.2019. Wired. Available at: https://www.wired.com/story/google-microsoft-warn-ai-may-do-dumb-things/ (accessed: 15.04.2022).
  22. 22. Hardesty L. Study finds. MIT - Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 11.02.2018. Available at: https://news.mit.edu/2018/study-finds-gender-skin-type-bias-artificial-intelligence-systems-0212 (accessed 27.07.2022).
  23. 23. Microsoft’s framework for building AI systems responsibly. 21.06.2022. Available at: https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2022/06/21/microsofts-framework-for-building-ai-systems-responsibly (accessed 24.01.2022).
  24. 24. O’Konnell D. Prishlo vremya peresmotret' nashi ozhidaniya ot iskusstvennogo intellekta. itWeek. Available at: https://www.itweek.ru/ai/article/detail.php?ID=223796 (accessed 24.01.2022).
  25. 25. Murav'ev D. Chto ne tak s komissiyami po ehtike v IT-kompaniyakh. Kak i pochemu «Google» uvol'nyaet spetsialistov po ehtike. Teplitsa sotsial'nykh tekhnologij. 31.03.2021. Available at: https://te-st.ru/2021/03/31/ethics-google-firing/ (accessed 7.01.2022).
  26. 26. Bender E.M., Gebru T., McMillan-Major A., Shmitchell Sh. On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 1.03.2021. Available at: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3442188.3445922?casa_token=j4JUXljVCYgAAAAA%3AKB4L4ARa0MKjw3mJh7ic8-H1LGQZa-agsCdsNRlitv7ENKbsj-byRfXtJV2VujJxplxq-vtD2Wo (accessed 27.01.2022).
  27. 27. Fried I. Google fires another AI ethics leader. 20.02.2021. Axious. Available at: https://www.axios.com/2021/02/19/google-fires-another-ai-ethics-leader (accessed 7.01.2022).
  28. 28. Standing with Dr. Timnit Gebru — #ISupportTimnit #BelieveBlackWomen. Google Walkout For Real Change. 4.12.2020. Available at: https://googlewalkout.medium.com/standing-with-dr-timnit-gebru-isupporttimnit-believeblackwomen-6dadc300d382 (accessed 7.01.2022).
  29. 29. Google’s research philosophy. Available at: https://research.google/philosophy/ (accessed 7.01.2022).
  30. 30. Pichai S. AI at Google: our principles. 07.07. 2018. Available at: https://www.blog.google/technology/ai/ai-principles (accessed 7.01.2022).
  31. 31. Gorelikov A. Krupnejshie agregatory zakazov otritsayut nekhvatku ruk i snizhenie zarplat // «Yandeks.Eda» i Delivery Club oprovergayut slukhi o zabastovke kur'erov. 28.04.2022. Available at: https://prosto.rabota.ru/post/yandeks-eda-i-delivery-club-oprovergayut-sluhi-o-zabastovke-kur-erov/ (accessed 7.06.2022).
  32. 32. Borak M. China’s gig workers are challenging their algorithmic bosses. Wired. 14.03.2022. Available at: https://www.wired.co.uk/profile/masha-borak. https://www.wired.co.uk/profile/masha-borak (accessed 23.05.2022).
  33. 33. Mowbray H. Trending StoriesTrending in China: A Beijing Bureaucrat Worked as Delivery Driver for a Day and Earned Just $6. CXTech. 29.04.2021. Available at: https://www.caixinglobal.com/2021-04-29/trending-in-china-a-beijing-bureaucrat-worked-as-delivery-driver-for-a-day-and-earned-just-6-101703920.html (accessed 23.05.2022).
  34. 34. China says to set governance rules for algorithms over next three years. Reuters. 21.09.2021. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/china/china-says-set-governance-rules-algorithms-over-next-three-years-2021-09-29 (accessed 23.05.2022)
  35. 35. Pravovye aspekty ispol'zovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta: aktual'nye problemy i vozmozhnye resheniya: doklad NIU VShEh. M.: Izdatel'skij dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2021. S. 36.
  36. 36. Kogda v Rossii poyavitsya «Kodeks po ehticheskim normam v sfere iskusstvennogo intellekta?» 13.12.2021. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FjfXrzPsGJ8 (accessed 27.01.2022).
  37. 37. Novaya II-real'nost': chto izmenitsya v rossijskoj industrii iskusstvennogo intellekta. 30.04.2022. ICT.Moscow. Available at: https://ict.moscow/news/ai-future-in-russia (accessed 29.05.2022).
  38. 38. Pravovye aspekty ispol'zovaniya iskusstvennogo intellekta: aktual'nye problemy i vozmozhnye resheniya: doklad NIU VShEh. M.: Izdatel'skij dom Vysshej shkoly ehkonomiki, 2021. S.36.
  39. 39. Tam zhe. S.36-37.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library