RAS PresidiumВопросы истории естествознания и техники Voprosy istorii estestvoznaniia i tekhniki

  • ISSN (Print) 0205-9606
  • ISSN (Online) 2713-041X

The End of the U.S. Policy of “Strategic ambiguity” toward Taiwan?

PII
S207054760023892-8-
DOI
10.18254/S207054760023892-8
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Special Issue
Pages
0
Abstract

The article explores the meaning, the process of formation and the political foundation of the concept of “strategic ambiguity” in US policy towards the Taiwan issue. The author discusses whether the Biden administration has abandoned it in favor of “strategic clarity”. The paper analyzes the political and academic debate over the policy of “strategic ambiguity” and the implications of the American administration’s current policy for the U.S. interests in Asia.

Keywords
The United States, the Biden administration, Taiwan, strategic ambiguity, the PRC
Date of publication
25.12.2022
Year of publication
2022
Number of purchasers
6
Views
392

References

  1. 1. Romberg, A. Rein in at the Brink of the Precipice: American Policy toward Taiwan and U.S.-PRC Relations. Washington, D.C.: Stimson Center, 2003. P. 14.
  2. 2. Mutual Defense Treaty between the United States and the Republic of China. December 2, 1954. Available at: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/chin001.asp (accessed: 10.11.2022).
  3. 3. Public Law 96-8. April 10, 1979. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/96/statute/STATUTE-93/STATUTE-93-Pg14.pdf (accessed: 15.11.2022).
  4. 4. Tsit. po: Lee, J. What the Taiwan Relations Act Really Means for the US Policy // Global Asia, 2022, № 3. P. 21.
  5. 5. Bush pledges whatever it takes to defend Taiwan. April 25, 2001. Available at: https://edition.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/04/24/bush.taiwan.abc/ (accessed: 17.11.2022).
  6. 6. Biden, J. Not So Deft On Taiwan // Washington Post. May 2, 2001. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2001/05/02/not-so-deft-on-taiwan/2adf3075-ee98-4e70-9be0-5459ce1edd5d/ (accessed: 17.11.2022).
  7. 7. Buren, P. The Virtues of Strategic Ambiguity // The American Conservative. April 25, 2022. Available at: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/the-virtues-of-strategic-ambiguity/ (accessed: 15.11.2022).
  8. 8. Buren, P. Strategic Ambiguity Works // The American Conservative. July 22, 2022. Available at: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/strategic-ambiguity-works/ (accessed: 16.11.2022).
  9. 9. Sm.: Paul, R. Strategic Clarity on Taiwan Would Be Disastrous. October 3, 2022. Available at: https://www.paul.senate.gov/american-conservative-op-ed-dr-rand-paul-strategic-clarity-taiwan-would-be-disastrous (accessed: 15.11.2022). The Danger of “Strategic Clarity” // The Defense Priorities. September 6, 2022. Available at: https://www.defensepriorities.org/newsletters/issues/2022-09-06-the-danger-of-strategic-clarity (accessed: 17.11.2022).
  10. 10. Should the United States Pledge to Defend Taiwan? // Foreign Affairs. November 15, 2022. Available at: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/ask-the-experts/should-united-states-pledge-defend-taiwan (accessed: 16.11.2022).
  11. 11. Thomas, R. The Defense of Taiwan: Confusion, Ambiguity or Clarity? // Global Asia. 2022, № 3. P. 65.
  12. 12. Mizokami, K. The U.S. Military 'Failed Miserably' in a Fake Battle Over Taiwan // Popular Mechanics. August 2, 2021. Available at: https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a37158827/us-military-failed-miserably-in-taiwan-invasion-wargame/ (accessed: 17.11.2022).
  13. 13. The Foreign Affairs: The Talk on Taiwan // The China Project. June 16, 2022. Available at: https://thechinaproject.com/2022/06/16/the-talk-on-taiwan/ (accessed: 17.11.2022).
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library