Везде
Man-machine metaphors in Soviet physiology
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Man-machine metaphors in Soviet physiology
Annotation
PII
S0205-96060000622-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
V. A. Gerovitch 
Edition
Volume 23 Issue 3
Pages
472-506
Abstract

This article examines several key shifts in the history of Soviet physiology by tracing the changing meanings of contemporary man-machine metaphors. Cybernetic metaphors entered Soviet academic discourse at a time of sharp group divisions in the physiological community. The scientific utility of machine analogies was intertwined with their philosophical and political meanings, and new interpretations of these metaphors emerged as a result of political conflicts and realignment offorces both within the scientific community and in society at large. Orthodox followers of Ivan Pavlov’s reflex theory vehemently opposed cybernetic analogies. They scorned the very idea of comparing the human being to a machine and condemned cybernetics as a variety of philosophical mechanicism and an ideological deviation from dialectical materialism. In their turn, cybernetic physiologists argued that it was the Pavlovian conditional reflex theory which degraded the organism by reducing it to a “reactive automaton,” and thereby fell under the rubric of “classical mechanicism.”

The author interprets the struggle between the orthodox Pavlovians and the adherents of physiological cybernetics as a conflict between two opposing man-machine metaphors in Soviet physiology. The Pavlovian theory was based on the telephone-switchboard metaphor of the higher nervous activity; its adherents internalized this metaphor so deeply that they could no longer see its mechanical nature. The cybernetic physiologists, on the other hand, were fascinated with the complexity and subtlety of physiological models mimicking digital computers and feedback-controlled servomechanisms. By referring to purposeful behavior, which was bracketed out by the orthodox Pavlovians, cybernetic metaphors opened new vistas for research. While both sides accused each other of “mechanistic,” reductionist methodology, they did not see anything “mechanistic” about their own central metaphors. Although on the surfathe Soviet debates over the meaning of cybernetics for physiology always stressed that the organism must not be reduced to a mechanism, Soviet physiology seemed to progress steadily from one man-machine metaphor to another. The constant travel of man-machine analogies back and forth between physiology and technology and the circular modeling of organisms and machines one upon the other has blurred the traditional categories of the “mechanistic” and the “organic” in Soviet physiology, as perhaps in the history of physiology in general.
Date of publication
01.09.2002
Number of purchasers
0
Views
85
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Bernshtejn N. A. Biomehanika i fiziologija dvizhenij. M., 1997.
  2. Kolmogorov A. N. Avtomaty i zhizn' // Vozmozhnoe i nevozmozhnoe v kibernetike / Pod red. A. I. Berga i Je. Kol'mana. M., 1963. S. 10-29.
  3. Frolov Ju. Ja Dialektika zhivoj prirody i sovremennaja kibernetika // Filosofskie voprosy kibernetiki / Pod red. V. A. Il'ina. M., 1961. S. 306-324.
  4. Viner N. Kibernetika, ili Upravlenie i svjaz' v zhivotnom i mashine. M., 1958.
  5. Shannon. S. and W. Weaver. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1949.
  6. McCulloch. W. and W. Pills. A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity // Bul letin of Mathematical Biophysics. Vol. 5. 1943. P. 115-133.
  7. Neumann, J. von. The Computer and the Brain. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.
  8. Bono. J. Science, Discourse, and Literature: The Role/Rule of Metaphor in Science // Literature and Science: Theory and Practice / Ed. by S. Peterfreund. Boston: Northeastern University Pres,s. 1990. P.59-89.
  9. Edwards. P. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War Amcnca. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1996.
  10. Foucaull, M. Power/Knowledge. N.Y.: Pantheon, 1980.
  11. Kay. L. Wlio Wrote the Book of Life? A History ofthe Genetic Code. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
  12. Shapin. S. andS. Schafer. Leviathan and the Air-Pump. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985.
  13. Leary. D. Psyche’s Muse; The Role of Metaphor in the Histoiy ofPsychology// Metaphors in the History ofPsychology/Ed. by D, Leary. Cambridge,UK:CambridgeUniversity Press, 1990.P. 1-
  14. Arbih. M.. and M. Hesse. The Constniction of Reality. Cambridge. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  15. Smith, L. Metaphors ofKnowledge and Behavior in the Behaviorist Tradition//Metaphors in the History of Psychology / Ed. by D. Leary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990. P. 239-266.
  16. Hojfman, R., et al. Cognitive Metaphors in Experimental Psychology // Metaphors in the History of Psychology/Ed.byD.Leary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990.P. 173-229.
  17. I. P. Pavlov: pro et contra. SPb., 1999.
  18. Grigorjan N. A. Ivan Petrovich Pavlov. M., 1999.
  19. Joravsky, D. Russian Psychology: A Critical History. Oxford, UK: Basil Blaclavcll, 1989.
  20. Todes, D. Pavlov’s Physiology Factory. Baltimor: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, 2001.
  21. Pavlov I. P. Otvet fiziologa psihologam (1932) // Mozg i psihika. M.—Voronezh, 1996. S. 151-183.
  22. Jaavlov Ja. Ja. Estestvoznanie i mozg (1909)//Mozg i psihika. M.—Voronezh, 1996. S. 67-78.
  23. Pavlov I. Ja. Lekcii o rabote bol'shih polusharij golovnogo mozga (1927). M., 1949.
  24. TeplovL. Ja. Ocherki o kibernetike. M., 1963.
  25. Stites, R. Revolutionary Dreams: Utopian Vision and Experimental Life in the Russian Revoluti on. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1989.
  26. Bailes, K. Alexei Gastevand the Soviet Controversy over Taylorism, 1918-1924//Soviet Studies. 1977. Vol. 29. P. 373-394.
  27. Johansson. K. Aleksej Gastev: Proletarian Bard ofthe Machine Age. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1983.
  28. Smetanin A. B. i dp. CIT i ego metody HOT. M., 1970.
  29. Rabinbach, A. The Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue, and the Origins of Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990.
  30. Grjehjem L. Estestvoznanie, filosofija i nauki o chelovecheskom povedenii v Sovetskom Sojuze. M., 1991.
  31. Demidov V. E. U istokov fiziologii aktivnosti // Kibernetika: proshloe dlja budushhego / Podred. B. V. Birjukova. M., 1989. S. 108-169.
  32. Sirotkina I. E. N. A. Bernshtejn: gody do i posle «Pavlovskoj sessii» // Repressirovannaja nauka / Pod red. M. G. Jaroshevskiogo. L., 1991. S. 319-326.
  33. Kozulin. A. Psychology in Utopia: Toward a Social History of Soviet Psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1984.
  34. Human MotorActions: Bernstein Reassessed /Ed.byH. Whiting. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1984.
  35. Bernshtejn H. A. Ocherki no istorii fiziologii dvizhenij i fiziologii aktivnosti. M., 1966.
  36. Petr Kuz'mich Anohin / Pod red. P. V. Simonova. M., 1990.
  37. Anohin Ja. K. Filosofskie aspekty teorii funkcional'noj sistemy. M., 1978.
  38. Krementsov, N. Stalinist Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
  39. Viner H. Kibernetika i obshhestvo. M., 1958.
  40. Gerovitch, S. From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: A History ofSoviet Cybernetics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2002.
  41. Heims. S. John von Neumann and Norbert Wiener: From Mathematics to the Technologies of Life and Death. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1980.
  42. Mindell. D. «Datum for Its Own Annihilation»: Feedback, Control, and Computing, 1916-1945. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. 1996.
  43. Pribram. K. From Metaphors to Models: The Use of Analogy in Neuropsychology // Metaphors in the History of Psychology / Ed. by D. Leary Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1990. P. 79-103.
  44. Heims. S. Constructing a Social Science for Postwar America: The Cybernetics Group, 1946-1953. Cambridge, Mass,: MIT Press, 1993.
  45. Boyd. R. Metaphor and Theory Change: What Is a «Metaphor» a Metaphor For? // Metaphor and Thought / Ed. by A. Ortony. Cambridge, UK: Univ. Press, 1993. P. 356-408.
  46. Galison. P. The Ontology of the Enemy: Norbert Wiener and the Cybernetic Vision //Critical Inquiry. 1994. Vol. 21. P. 228-266.
  47. Systems, Experts, and Computers: The Systems Approach in Management and Engineering, World War II and After/Ed. by A. Hughes andT. Hughes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2000.
  48. Mirowski, P. When Games Grow Deadly Serious: The Military Influence on the Evolution of Game Theory // Economics and National Security / Ed.by C. Goodwin. Durham: Duke University Press, 1991. P. 227-255.
  49. Pickering, A. Cyborg History and the WWII Regime // Perspectives on Science. 1995. Vol. 3. P. 1-48.
  50. Haraway, £>. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention ofNature.N.Y.: Routledge, 1991.
  51. Vucinich, A. Empire ofKnowledge: The Academy of Sciences of the USSR (1917-1970). Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
  52. Gerovitch, S. «Russian Scandals»: Soviet Readings of American Cybernetics in the Early Years of the Cold War // The Russian Review. 2001. Vol. 60. P. 545-568.
  53. Kibernetika // Kratkij filosofskij slovar' / Pod red. M. Rozentalja i P. Judina. M., 1954. S. 236-237.
  54. Materialist (psevdonim). Komu sluzhit kibernetika? // Voprosy filosofii. 1953. N° 5. S. 210-219.
  55. Medvedev N. V. Marksistsko-leninskaja teorija otrazhenija i uchenie I. P. Pavlova o vysshej nervnoj dejatel'nosti, M., 1954.
  56. Byhovskij B. Je. K|gbsrnstika—amerikanskaja lzhenauka//Priroda. 1952. Kg 7. S. 125-127.
  57. B'ehovskijB. Je. Nauka sovremennyh rabovladel'cev//Nauka i zhizn'. 1953. №6. S. 42—44.
  58. Gerovitch. S. «Mathematical Machines» of the Cold War: Soviet Computing, American Cybernetics and Ideological Disputes in the Early 1950s // Social Studies of Science. 2001. Vol. 31. P. 253-287.
  59. Gladkov T. K. Kibernetika — psevdonauka o mashinah, zhivotnyh, cheloveke i obshhestve // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. 1955. No. 1. S. 57-67.
  60. Lentin.A. LaCybemetique: ProblemesReels et Mystification// LaPensee. 1953. No.47. P. 47-61.
  61. Pavlov I. P. Uslovnyj refleks (1936) I Mozg i psihika. M.—Voronezh, 1996.
  62. Anohin P. K. Zamechanija po povodu recenzii E. A. Shkabara i L. N. Dashevskogo na stat'ju o «kibernetike» // Rossijskij gosudarstvennyj arhiv literatury i iskusstva (RGALI). F. 634. Op. 3. D. 206. L. 139-140.
  63. Leont'ev A. N. i dr. Otchet o dejatel'nosti delegacii sovetskih uchsnyh-psihologov XIV Mezhdunarodnom psihologicheskom kongresse v Monreale// Rossijskij gosudarstven nyj arhiv novejshej istorii (RGANI). F. 5. Op. 16. D. 468. L. 111-147.
  64. Medvedev. Zh. Soviet Science. N.Y.: Norton, 1978.
  65. Vajl' P.. GenisA. 60-e: mir sovetskogo cheloveka. M., 1996.
  66. Problemy kibernetiki / Pod red. V. V. Parina. M., 1969.
  67. Gerovitch. S. Striving for «Optimal Control»: Soviet Cybernetics as a «Science of Government» // Cultures of Control / Ed. by M. Levin. Amsterdam: Harwood, 2000. P. 247-264.
  68. Holloway. D. Innovation in Science—the Case of Cybernetics in the Soviet Union//Science Studies. 1974. Vol. 4. P. 299-337.
  69. Keldysh M. B. i dp. Matematicheskie voprosy teorii schetnyh mashin // Sessija Akademii nauk SSSR po nauchnym problemam avtomatizacii proizvodstva. M.. 1957. S. 100-130.
  70. Kirillin V.. Frolov L*.. V CK KPSS (1958)//RGANI. F. 5. Op. 35. D. 76. L. 161-162.
  71. Filosofskie problemy sovremennogo estestvoznanija / Pod red. P. N. Fedoseeva. M., 1959.
  72. Sobolev S. Da, jeto vpolne ser'ezno! // Vozmozhnoe i nevozmozhnoe v kibernetike / Pod red. A. I. Berga i Je. Kol'mana. M., 1963. S. 82-88.
  73. Ljapunov A. A., Jablonskij S. V. Teoreticheskie problemy kibernetiki (1963)//Ljapunov L, L. Problemy teoreticheskoj i prikladnoj kibernetiki, M., 1980. S. 71-88.
  74. Ljapunov A. A. O nekotoryh obshhih voprosah kibernetiki (1958)// Ljapunov A. A. Problemy teoreticheskoj i prikladnoj kibernetiki. M., 1980. S. 54-71.
  75. Gal'perin I. I. O reflektornoj prirode upravljajushhih 1957. №4. S. 158-168.
  76. Josephson, R. New Atlantis Revisited: Akademgorodok, the Siberian City of Science. Princeton; Univ. Press, 1997.
  77. Adams, M. Biology After Stalin//Survey. 1977-1978. Vol. 23. P. 53-80.
  78. Gillespie. R. The Politics ofCybernetics in the Soviet Union // Scientists and Public Affairs/ Ed. by A. Teich. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1974. P. 239-298.
  79. Bernshtejn H. A. Puti razvitija fiziologii i svjazannye s nimi zadachi kibernetiki // Biologicheskie aspekty kibernetiki / Pod red. A. M. Kuzina. M., 1962. S. 52-65.
  80. Filosofskie voprosy fiziologii vysshej nervnoj dejatel'nosti i psihologii / Pod red. P. N. Fedoseeva. M., 1963.
  81. Boigard M. M. Problema uznavanija. M., 1967.
  82. Ivanov V. V. Iz istorii kibernetiki v SSSR. Ocherk zhizni i dejatel'nosti M. L. Cetlina// Ocherki istorii informatiki v Rossii / Pod red. D. A. Pospelova i Ja. I. Feta. Novosibirsk, 1998. S. 556-580.
  83. Cetpin M.L. Issledovanija po teorii avtomatov i modelirovaniju biologicheskih sistem. M., 1969.
  84. Chhaidze L. Koordinacija proizvol'nyh dvizhenij cheloveka v uslovijah kosmicheskogo poleta. M., 1965. .
  85. Requin, J.. el al. Bernstein’s Purposeful Brain // Human Motor Actions: Bernstein Reassessed / Ed. by H. Whiting. Amsterdam: North Holland. 1984. P. 467-499.
  86. Daugman, J. Brain Metaphor and Brain Theory // Computational Neuroscience / Ed. by E. Schwartz. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 1990. P. 9-18.
  87. Canguilhem, G. The Development of the Concept of Biological Regulation in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries // Ideology and Rationality in the History of the Life Sciences / Ed. by A. Goldhammer. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1988. P. 81-102
  88. Coleman, W. Biology in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, UK: Univ. Press, 1971.
  89. Krementsov. N.. andD. Todes. On Metaphors, Animals, and Us//JoumalofSocial Issues. Vol . 47. 1991. P. 67-81.
  90. Toulmin, S. andJ. Goodfield. The Architecture of Matter. N.Y.: Harper & Row, 1962.
  91. Vartanian. A. Man-Machine from the Greeks to the Computer// Dictionary ofthe History of Ideas. Vol. III. N.Y.: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973. P. 131-146.
  92. Canguilhem. G. The Role of Analogies and Models in Biological Discovery // Scientific Change / Ed. by A. Crombie. London; Heinemann, 1963. P. 507-520.
  93. Sapir, J. The Anatomy of Metaphor // The Social Use of Metaphor / Ed. by J. Sapir and J. Crocker. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1977. P. 3-32.
  94. Cohen. J. Human Robots in Myth and Science. London: Allen & Unwin, 1966.
  95. Bowker, G. How to be Universal: Some Cybernetic Strategies, 1943-70// Social Studies of Science 1993. Vol. 23. P. 107-127.
  96. Toulmin, S. From Clocks to Chaos; Humanizing the Mechanistic World-View // The Machine MetaphorandTool/Ed.byH.Haken A Karlqvist, andU. Svedin. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993. P. 139-153.
  97. Williams. R. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1985.
  98. Merchant, C. The Death ofNature: Women, Ecology, and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco; Harper & Row, 1980.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate