The human being in medical experimentation: Rereading Veresaev
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
The human being in medical experimentation: Rereading Veresaev
Annotation
PII
S0205-96060000622-1-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Pages
24-37
Abstract

A characteristic feature of modern science is the constantly growing experimentation with human beings as test objects. The development of experiments involving human beings goes hand in hand with the establishment and application of ethical norms aimed at their regulation. This article attempts to trace the evolution of ethical norms in the field of biomedical studies by analyzing the famous work of a Russian author Vikcntii Veresaev (1867-1945), entitled “Notes of a Doctor.” Published in 1901, this book immediately attracted a wide attention among the men and women of learning in both Russia and many Western countries for the earnest consideration of a number of issues central to medical ethics. Decades later, some of the ethical principles formulated in its pages came to be viewed as the cornerstones of conventional norms addressing the moral aspects of medical experiments.

Date of publication
01.12.2001
Number of purchasers
0
Views
124
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References



Additional sources and materials

  1. Ahutin A. V. Istorija principov fizicheskogo jeksperimenta: ot antichnosti do XVII v. M„ 1976.
  2. Yudin V. Ethical Industry in Experiments with Humans.-In: J. Glasa (ed.) Ethics Committees in Central and Eastern Europe. Charis-IMEB Fdn., Bratislava, 2000.
  3. Veresaev V. V. Zapiski vracha // Sobr. soch. V 4-h t. T. 1. M., 1985.
  4. Katz J. Experimentation with Human Beings. Russel Sage Foundation. N.Y., 1972.
  5. Kubar' O. I. Jeticheskie i pravovye normy v issledovanijah na cheloveke: iz istorii Rossii XX veka// Chelovek. 2001. № 3.
  6. Meliiinskoe obozrenie. 1917. T. LXXXVII. № 13-16. S. 618-631.
  7. Hejsii M. L. K voprosu o vrachah. Krasnojarsk, 1902.
  8. Rothman D. J. The Shame of Medical Research.-New York Review of Books Nov. 30,2000.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate