Trofim Lysenko’s “New Doctrine of the Species”: An Attempt at Close Reading
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Trofim Lysenko’s “New Doctrine of the Species”: An Attempt at Close Reading
Annotation
PII
S0205960624020012-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Maxim Vinarskii 
Affiliation: St. Petersburg Branch of S. I. Vavilov Institute for the History of Science and Technology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Pages
225-249
Abstract
One of the core themes in the Soviet Michurinist biology was pointing out Darwin’s “errors” and a plea for a revision of classical Darwinism, allegedly based on “flat evolutionism” (= gradualism) and misinterpretation of the dialectics of the organic evolution. The result was the so-called “Soviet creative Darwinism” that promoted fundamentally new concepts of the biological species and speciation, and was coined the “new doctrine of the species” (NDS) during the 1952–1955 discussion. Even though Lysenkoism has been thoroughly studied, the basic postulates of the NDS, its logical structure and genesis remained outside the scope of attention of the historians of science. Based on primary sources, principally on T. D. Lysenko’s own publications, this article is an attempt at presenting a holistic view of the NDS and identifying its conceptual origins. The content of the NDS is shown to be closely associated with the postulates of dialectical materialism used as the philosophical grounding for the new theory. Most of its biological content is not original and was borrowed by Lysenko from other sources. The more or less original elements of the “new doctrine” were the rejection of the intraspecific struggle for existence and the “physiological” concept of speciation, based on the belief that the most important mechanism of evolutionary transformations is changes in species-specific metabolism. Both of these elements were rejected by biology in the course of its further advancement while some others (inheritance of acquired traits, speciation by leaps) find their supporters today. However, modern ideas of saltational evolution have no continuity with the NDS, as they are based on the mutational paradigm rejected by Lysenko.  
Keywords
лысенкоизм «советский творческий дарвинизм» вид видообразование организм и среда наследственность история эволюционной биологии
Received
11.05.2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
20
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Kuznetsova S. I. K voprosu o vozobnovlenii znamen remeslennykh tsekhov Sankt-Peterburga v seredine — vtoroj polovine KhIKh veka (iz sobraniya gosudarstvennogo muzeya istorii Sankt-Peterburga) // Trudy Gosudarstvennogo Ehrmitazha: [T.] 104 : Geral'dika: issledovaniya i praktika : materialy nauchnoj konferentsii 20—22 fevralya 2020 goda / Gosudarstvennyj Ehrmitazh. SPb.: Izd-vo Gos. Ehrmitazha, 2021. S. 191—215 i drugie.

2. Perekhodenko K. V. K voprosu o funktsiyakh znáchikov remeslennykh tsekhovykh uprav v Rossijskoj imperii // Vspomogatel'nye istoricheskie distsipliny v sovremennom nauchnom znanii: Materialy XXXVI Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferentsii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. Moskva, 4—5 aprelya 2024 g. / otv. red. I. G. Konovalova, E. V. Pchelov; Ros. gos. gumanitar. un-t, Ist.-arkh. in-t, Istoricheskij f-t, Kaf. vspomogat. ist. distsiplin i arkheografii; Ros. akad. nauk, In-t vseobschej istorii. M.: IVI RAN, 2024.

3. Traktat Bartolo di Sassoferrato «O znakakh i gerbakh» / vstup. st., per. A. P. Chernykh // Srednie veka. Vyp. 52. M.: Nauka, 1989.

4. Tsekhovye znamena remeslennykh tsekhov Sankt-Peterburga kontsa XVIII — nachala XX veka iz sobraniya Gosudarstvennogo muzeya istorii Sankt-Peterburga: al'bom-katalog / GMI SPb; avt.-sost. S. I. Kuznetsova. SPb.: GMI SPb, 2019.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate